DESIGN SCIENCE DYSFUNCTIONS (28 September 2022)

Description

It’s late at night. Only because Jan has been asked to talk about something he knows very little about so we asked someone at the other side of the planet for help – the wonderful Shirley Gregor. With her on the show, it is finally time to talk about design science, clichés and stereotypes. We ask science whether more people write about doing design science than actually do design science, how scholarly design research has to be, and why Izak Benbasat might be the most successful design scientist of all time.

Episode Reading List

  • Tremblay, M. C., VanderMeer, D. E., & Beck, R. (2018). The Effects of the Quantification of Faculty Productivity: Perspectives from the Design Science Research Community. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43(34), 625–661.
  • Mädche, A., Gregor, S., & Parsons, J. (2021). Mapping Design Contributions in Information Systems Research: The Design Research Activity Framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 49(14), 355-378.
  • Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312-335.
  • Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., & Elmqvist, N. (2016). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (6th ed.). Pearson.
  • Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145-182.
  • Diederich, S., Brendel, A. B., Morana, S., & Kolbe, L. (2022). On the Design of and Interaction with Conversational Agents: An Organizing and Assessing Review of Human-Computer Interaction Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 96-138.
  • Gregor, S., Imran, A., & Turner, T. (2014). A ‘Sweet Spot’ Change Strategy for a Least Developed Country: Leveraging e-Government in Bangladesh. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 655-671.
  • Berente, N., Srinivasan, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2008, 14-16 December 2008). Design Principles for IT in Doubly Distributed Design Networks. 29th International Conference on Information Systems, Paris, France.
  • Gregor, S., & Benbasat, I. (1999). Explanations from Intelligent Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Practice. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 497-530.
  • Recker, J. (2021). Improving the State-Tracking Ability of Corona Dashboards. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 476-495.
  • Iivari, J., Hansen, M. R. P., & Haj-Bolouri, A. (2021). A Proposal for Minimum Reusability Evaluation of Design Principles. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 286-303.
  • Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., & Seidel, S. (2020). The Anatomy of a Design Principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), 1622-1652.
  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and Method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publication Corporation.
  • Mumford, E. (1993). The ETHICS Approach. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 82.
  • Avison, D. E., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1990). Multiview: An Exploration in Information Systems Development. McGraw Hill.
  • Frank, U., & Lange, C. (2007). E-MEMO: A Method to Support the Development of Customized Electronic Commerce Systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 5(2), 93-116.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

The Home Page of Professor Jan Recker